![]() One of the URLs mentioned in the film is multinational monitor which tracks corporate fines: * Collusion between governments and corporations. There are a lot of issues involving patents, trademarks, and copyrights that weren't exposed. Unlike other areas, I don't think they covered this area in depth enough. This section also included patenting genes in humans. ![]() * Expansion of corporations into new areas including water privatization. If you liked this section, you will probably enjoy Noam Chomsky's "Manufacturing Consent" film (also here at ). There was a section on marketers targeting children through their study of nagging and another on inventing a virtue of being a consumer. * Marketing and manipulation that corporations use. It focused on how corporations are typically only interested in money even at the expense of society. * A history of corporations through the modern incantation. It's hard for anyone to argue in favor of sweatshops that employ children. ![]() I found some of the opposing arguments weak, but I didn't feel that the people behind the film sought out easy targets. ![]() If there was a point that an interviewer made such as on sweatshops, they had a section with a business man who would try to defend that position. While any documentary will show some signs of bias, I thought this was more or less even in its execution. Can we move in a different direction so businesses are more accountable to society? I think one of the goals of this film is to get people to question whether we should continue with the way things are done. This film has a deep concern over how corporations use their power and influence. I don't want to ruin the story, but this film wouldn't be the same without his story. The story of CEO Ray Anderson is a sign that some change is possible. While parts of it will anger you, it's not all gloom and doom. This includes interviews with Harvard business professors and CEOs of large corporations. This is a highly visual documentary which should appeal to a broader audience. If you're expecting a mediator between two sides debating, this is not your type of documentary. I enjoy watching documentaries and this is an excellent one. It has reportedly been downloaded over half a million times through various sources and there are no reviews here? I can't believe there are no real reviews for this documentary. It's acceptable quality when viewed in full screen mode on a 22" LCD. Mplayer (Debian build) plays this movie fine. The avi version has the largest native resolution which should show up best on your screen. TheCorporation-Movie- Part1.ogv: VIDEO: 522x300 24bpp 30.000 fps TheCorporation-Movie- Part1.avi: VIDEO: 640x368 24bpp 30.000 fps Here is the video information from mplayer: I downloaded all three versions of part one in order to compare them. Because they use different codecs, file size is not always a good indicator of quality. They are not equivalent in terms of resolution. Here are the best documentary films of all time.You're probably wondering which version you should download. Now, whatever era of the genre is your favorite, don't worry -we poured through decades of film to compile the best of them. Go forward a couple years and you'll see Sound and Fury, a beautifully filmed look at the deaf community and the way we communicate with each other. That year, When We Were Kings won an Oscar for its portrait of Muhammad Ali. We're just asking that you go back a few years, where there are even more gems waiting for you.įor example: You have to throw it back to 1996 if you want a sports documentary that'll thrill you as much as MJ did in The Last Dance. Debate what the Tinder Swindler is guilty of doing. Yes, we love to queue up a Netflix doc as much as you do. Nowadays, it's trendy to call today's era in documentary filmmaking-we're talking about the past few years, when we've seen whole damn events like Tiger Kingand The Last Dance -the boom times for the genre.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |